Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2971 - 2980 of 78671 for restraining order/1000.
Search results 2971 - 2980 of 78671 for restraining order/1000.
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
petitioned the Lafayette County Circuit Court for a child abuse restraining order against their father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31
petitioned the Lafayette County Circuit Court for a child abuse restraining order against their father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15192 - 2005-03-31
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
petitioned the Lafayette County Circuit Court for a child abuse restraining order against their father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
petitioned the Lafayette County Circuit Court for a child abuse restraining order against their father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
petitioned the Lafayette County Circuit Court for a child abuse restraining order against their father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31
petitioned the Lafayette County Circuit Court for a child abuse restraining order against their father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2172 - 2005-03-31
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
petitioned the Lafayette County Circuit Court for a child abuse restraining order against their father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2173 - 2005-03-31
petitioned the Lafayette County Circuit Court for a child abuse restraining order against their father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 73
restraining order preventing the project from moving forward during the pendency of the action. ΒΆ6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871495 - 2025-01-24
restraining order preventing the project from moving forward during the pendency of the action. ΒΆ6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871495 - 2025-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
-Respondent. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: richard j
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26962 - 2006-10-30
-Respondent. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: richard j
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26962 - 2006-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
while armed with a dangerous weapon, substantial battery, and violating a restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102466 - 2010-11-02
while armed with a dangerous weapon, substantial battery, and violating a restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102466 - 2010-11-02
[PDF]
Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
Ins. Co., 166 Wis.2d 1000, 1006, 480 N.W.2d 836, 839 (Ct. App. 1992). We will not disturb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19
Ins. Co., 166 Wis.2d 1000, 1006, 480 N.W.2d 836, 839 (Ct. App. 1992). We will not disturb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19
09AP1485 Gordon P. Knuth v. Town of Cedarburg.doc
and he was over assessed $455.32. Knuth insists that the correct equalized tax rate is $8.9010 per $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45887 - 2010-01-19
and he was over assessed $455.32. Knuth insists that the correct equalized tax rate is $8.9010 per $1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45887 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the correct equalized tax rate is $8.9010 per $1000 of equalized valuation. The record before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45887 - 2014-09-15
that the correct equalized tax rate is $8.9010 per $1000 of equalized valuation. The record before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45887 - 2014-09-15