Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2971 - 2980 of 20931 for word.
Search results 2971 - 2980 of 20931 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
" is mandatory. ¶11 The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16947 - 2017-09-21
" is mandatory. ¶11 The word "shall," when used in a statute, is presumed to be mandatory unless another
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ryan E. Baker
... shall be applied to the payment of the judgment.” Section 969.02(6). “[T]he word ‘shall’ is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7346 - 2017-09-20
... shall be applied to the payment of the judgment.” Section 969.02(6). “[T]he word ‘shall’ is presumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7346 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or parents … of the information specified under sub. (1). In other words, § 48.356(2) requires any written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142876 - 2017-09-21
or parents … of the information specified under sub. (1). In other words, § 48.356(2) requires any written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142876 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and arguments, concluded, “I believe [trial counsel]. I do not believe a word that has come out of Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119619 - 2014-09-15
and arguments, concluded, “I believe [trial counsel]. I do not believe a word that has come out of Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119619 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jason R. Sigmon
was incorrect in two respects. First, the adequacy of a plea colloquy is judged by the words of the colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21071 - 2013-05-13
was incorrect in two respects. First, the adequacy of a plea colloquy is judged by the words of the colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21071 - 2013-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
ignore the word “necessary,” which is expressly included in the statute and present even in Conners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50286 - 2015-04-08
ignore the word “necessary,” which is expressly included in the statute and present even in Conners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50286 - 2015-04-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard, however, is a suggestion that we ignore the word “necessary,” which is expressly included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15
standard, however, is a suggestion that we ignore the word “necessary,” which is expressly included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response Brief of Billie Johnson, Chris Goebel, Ed Perkins, Eric O'Keefe, Joe Sanfelippo, Terry Moulton, Robert Jensen, Ron Zahn, Ruth Elmer, and Ruth Streck
and/or were incorrectly decided; (2) the word “contiguous,” based on dictionary definitions, means literal
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefjohnson.pdf - 2023-10-30
and/or were incorrectly decided; (2) the word “contiguous,” based on dictionary definitions, means literal
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1030responsebriefjohnson.pdf - 2023-10-30
[PDF]
Frontsheet
not be 'substantially similar' to the 'legal status' of marriage." Appling, 345 Wis. 2d 762, ¶5. In other words
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118664 - 2014-09-15
not be 'substantially similar' to the 'legal status' of marriage." Appling, 345 Wis. 2d 762, ¶5. In other words
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118664 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Althea M. Keup v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
the plain words of the statute in question to ascertain its meaning. Id. To determine if a statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16594 - 2017-09-21
the plain words of the statute in question to ascertain its meaning. Id. To determine if a statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16594 - 2017-09-21