Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29701 - 29710 of 70081 for hi.
Search results 29701 - 29710 of 70081 for hi.
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his request for a change of venue, that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98299 - 2013-06-19
by denying his request for a change of venue, that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98299 - 2013-06-19
State v. Calvin R. Mitchell
evidence of his prior convictions; (2) the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4024 - 2005-03-31
evidence of his prior convictions; (2) the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 30
. Puchacz argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to strike three No. 2009AP840
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46000 - 2014-09-15
. Puchacz argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to strike three No. 2009AP840
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46000 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
length. We conclude that Cook fails to meet his burden to prove that the ordinance’s provision limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32846 - 2008-05-28
length. We conclude that Cook fails to meet his burden to prove that the ordinance’s provision limiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32846 - 2008-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the two cases. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective in one of the cases because she failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17
in the two cases. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective in one of the cases because she failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862199 - 2024-10-17
[PDF]
Donald R. Binsfeld v. Donald S. Conrad
that Conrad did not show excusable neglect sufficient to justify filing his answer four days after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6405 - 2017-09-19
that Conrad did not show excusable neglect sufficient to justify filing his answer four days after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6405 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Vernon L. Fink
a difference in the strength of his case. We reverse and remand for a new trial.1 Fink was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8085 - 2017-09-19
a difference in the strength of his case. We reverse and remand for a new trial.1 Fink was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8085 - 2017-09-19
State v. Larry Lamont Gatewood
), 943.32(2), 939.05 and 939.63 (1999-2000).[1] Gatewood claims: (1) his due process rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3392 - 2005-03-31
), 943.32(2), 939.05 and 939.63 (1999-2000).[1] Gatewood claims: (1) his due process rights were violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Timothy P. Zoellick
issues: (1) the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain his conviction for disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4325 - 2017-09-19
issues: (1) the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain his conviction for disorderly conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4325 - 2017-09-19
09AP1485 Gordon P. Knuth v. Town of Cedarburg.doc
ANDERSON, J.[1] Gordon P. Knuth contests the circuit court’s determination that his small claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45887 - 2010-01-19
ANDERSON, J.[1] Gordon P. Knuth contests the circuit court’s determination that his small claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45887 - 2010-01-19