Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29701 - 29710 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.

State v. Harris D. Byers
that (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to take a plea in a ch. 980 case; (2) if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2273 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Monica M. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1821-FT Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14199 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
or preclusive effect to the stipulated judgment in Door County case No. 2000CV57, in which Emily, by her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29415 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
facie case that it has the right to enforce the note entered into by the Sowls. For the reasons we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10

[PDF] Norvin Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
2000 WI App 95 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14951 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Derrick L. Madlock
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-2718-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14528 - 2017-09-21

Diane L. C. v. Michael D. P.
of parental rights (TPR) case. Michael D.P. appeals orders of the trial court terminating his parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25631 - 2006-06-21

[PDF] Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9292 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Diane L. C. v. Michael D. P.
, P.J. 1 This is a private termination of parental rights (TPR) case. Michael D.P. appeals orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25631 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
) the court should have given precedential or preclusive effect to the stipulated judgment in Door County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29415 - 2007-06-18