Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29711 - 29720 of 62063 for child support.
Search results 29711 - 29720 of 62063 for child support.
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the transcript supports the conviction, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In November 2001, Perkins was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28930 - 2014-09-15
that the transcript supports the conviction, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In November 2001, Perkins was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28930 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the adjudication because it shows that Dylan acted with intent to leave the classroom rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90260 - 2012-12-11
to support the adjudication because it shows that Dylan acted with intent to leave the classroom rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90260 - 2012-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous and support the suppression decision, we affirm the judgment of conviction. ¶2 Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34360 - 2008-10-20
erroneous and support the suppression decision, we affirm the judgment of conviction. ¶2 Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34360 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict in Kyser’s favor. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27582 - 2014-09-15
is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict in Kyser’s favor. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27582 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deficient. The facts from that hearing do not support Zimmerman’s allegations. ¶5 At the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85649 - 2014-09-15
deficient. The facts from that hearing do not support Zimmerman’s allegations. ¶5 At the postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85649 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was not supported by reasonable suspicion. At an evidentiary hearing on the suppression motion, the officer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236817 - 2019-03-05
was not supported by reasonable suspicion. At an evidentiary hearing on the suppression motion, the officer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236817 - 2019-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the psychotropic medications. The County presented sufficient evidence to support the order extending
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162381 - 2017-09-21
to the psychotropic medications. The County presented sufficient evidence to support the order extending
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162381 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the proceedings. The Department presented sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The jury found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95342 - 2014-09-15
of the proceedings. The Department presented sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The jury found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95342 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion and supporting affidavit alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420196 - 2021-09-08
a postconviction motion and supporting affidavit alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420196 - 2021-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
is Lexi’s owner because the certificate lists her as a co-owner. In support, Peebles offers a single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81027 - 2012-04-16
is Lexi’s owner because the certificate lists her as a co-owner. In support, Peebles offers a single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81027 - 2012-04-16