Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29711 - 29720 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 29711 - 29720 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Alexander Dejesus
consistently repeated: "the crucial test is whether, taking into account all of the circumstances surrounding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31
consistently repeated: "the crucial test is whether, taking into account all of the circumstances surrounding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derron Haynes
. For all of these reasons, Haynes’s argument fails the “totality of circumstances” test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14240 - 2005-03-31
. For all of these reasons, Haynes’s argument fails the “totality of circumstances” test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14240 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard T. Malin
was admissible.[1] The test for harmless error is “whether there is a reasonable possibility that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5466 - 2005-03-31
was admissible.[1] The test for harmless error is “whether there is a reasonable possibility that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5466 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
substance tested positive for methamphetamine. The State also introduced a bond form Jensen had signed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737034 - 2023-12-05
substance tested positive for methamphetamine. The State also introduced a bond form Jensen had signed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737034 - 2023-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
. The test for allowing withdrawal before sentencing is whether the defendant shows a fair and just reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14171 - 2014-09-15
. The test for allowing withdrawal before sentencing is whether the defendant shows a fair and just reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14171 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
. The test for allowing withdrawal before sentencing is whether the defendant shows a fair and just reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14172 - 2014-09-15
. The test for allowing withdrawal before sentencing is whether the defendant shows a fair and just reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. Lewis
. No. 99-0021-CR 5 Lewis spent much of his brief claiming that the six-factor test of State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14960 - 2017-09-21
. No. 99-0021-CR 5 Lewis spent much of his brief claiming that the six-factor test of State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14960 - 2017-09-21
Tony Eppenger v. Jon E. Litscher
the substantial evidence test on review of disciplinary decisions, under which we determine whether reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2929 - 2005-03-31
the substantial evidence test on review of disciplinary decisions, under which we determine whether reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2929 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing and DNA testing.[3] The trial court summarily denied the motion. This court affirmed. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35937 - 2009-03-23
hearing and DNA testing.[3] The trial court summarily denied the motion. This court affirmed. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35937 - 2009-03-23
[PDF]
State v. Ronald T. Tomasko
at 55, 556 N.W.2d at 684. The question of reasonableness is determined by a commonsense test. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14872 - 2017-09-21
at 55, 556 N.W.2d at 684. The question of reasonableness is determined by a commonsense test. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14872 - 2017-09-21