Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29721 - 29730 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] Debra L. Kontowicz v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin
, Defendants-Appellants. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2006 WI 48 Reported at: ___ Wis. 2d ___, 714
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25818 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
eligibility for the Earned Release Program (ERP). The court denied Smith’s motion and he appeals.[1] Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37598 - 2009-07-20

COURT OF APPEALS
charged with escape.[2] He did not appeal from his conviction. In 2007, he filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34574 - 2008-11-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
preserved for appellate review because no postconviction motion was filed raising it. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163996 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a crime, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Attorney Marcella De Peters filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195139 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles R. Hall
appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7290 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Ronald L. Mikkelson
Mikkelson appeals from an order denying his motion for a reduced sentence. Mikkelson based his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14840 - 2017-09-21

State v. Walter Rieckhoff
and an order denying his motion to suppress evidence of the results of a blood test. Because the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3201 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
motion to dismiss. After a hearing at which VanWormer did not appear, the court granted a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163750 - 2017-09-21

Debra L. Kontowicz v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin
. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2006 WI 48 Reported at: ___ Wis. 2d ___, 714 N.W.2d 105 Opinion Filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25818 - 2006-07-06