Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29721 - 29730 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29721 - 29730 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 22, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61469 - 2011-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 22, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61469 - 2011-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction be vacated and the case dismissed or, in the alternative, that the court grant him a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133330 - 2015-01-21
of conviction be vacated and the case dismissed or, in the alternative, that the court grant him a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133330 - 2015-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85419 - 2012-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85419 - 2012-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the incident with your friend from this case and judge this case based on the facts that you hear in court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31953 - 2008-02-27
the incident with your friend from this case and judge this case based on the facts that you hear in court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31953 - 2008-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, and over Cramer’s objection, the court joined the three cases. The court concluded that the charges were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39992 - 2009-08-26
, and over Cramer’s objection, the court joined the three cases. The court concluded that the charges were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39992 - 2009-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
), is applicable to the facts in this case. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33255 - 2008-07-01
), is applicable to the facts in this case. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33255 - 2008-07-01
Appellate court eFiling – Wisconsin Court System eFile Support
court eFiling - Delegating staff access to attorney accounts eFile: New case Appellate court eFiling
/hc/en-us/categories/360004077272-Appellate-court-eFiling
court eFiling - Delegating staff access to attorney accounts eFile: New case Appellate court eFiling
/hc/en-us/categories/360004077272-Appellate-court-eFiling
[PDF]
Appellate Court COVID-19 order
, or other documents in the following cases pending in the Supreme Court, which are currently scheduled
/news/docs/covid19appellate.pdf - 2020-03-17
, or other documents in the following cases pending in the Supreme Court, which are currently scheduled
/news/docs/covid19appellate.pdf - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
Appellate Court operations COVID-19
, or other documents in the following cases pending in the Supreme Court, which are currently scheduled
/news/docs/covid19coa.pdf - 2020-03-25
, or other documents in the following cases pending in the Supreme Court, which are currently scheduled
/news/docs/covid19coa.pdf - 2020-03-25
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - 08-22-2023 Court Order
Case 2023AP001399 08-22-2023 Court Order Filed 08-22-2023 Page 1 of 2 Page 2 August 22, 2023
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0810order.pdf - 2023-10-16
Case 2023AP001399 08-22-2023 Court Order Filed 08-22-2023 Page 1 of 2 Page 2 August 22, 2023
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0810order.pdf - 2023-10-16