Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29731 - 29740 of 97794 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29731 - 29740 of 97794 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 26, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84078 - 2012-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 26, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84078 - 2012-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
for case No. 2010AP563-CR. By an order dated April 29, 2010, this court determined that the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63471 - 2012-02-19
for case No. 2010AP563-CR. By an order dated April 29, 2010, this court determined that the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63471 - 2012-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
improper. Singly or together, they do not make this an “exceptional case.” By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59410 - 2011-02-01
improper. Singly or together, they do not make this an “exceptional case.” By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59410 - 2011-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
to the incidents underlying the arrest in this case. The court determined there was nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81562 - 2012-04-25
to the incidents underlying the arrest in this case. The court determined there was nothing improper about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81562 - 2012-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
products liability. The court granted the motion[4] and the case was submitted to the jury only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76801 - 2012-01-18
products liability. The court granted the motion[4] and the case was submitted to the jury only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76801 - 2012-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS
and an unpublished case of this court interpreting Bohling, Milewski established that she had a “reasonable objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104909 - 2013-11-26
and an unpublished case of this court interpreting Bohling, Milewski established that she had a “reasonable objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104909 - 2013-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of double jeopardy absent a showing of prosecutorial intent as defined in the case law, and the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
of double jeopardy absent a showing of prosecutorial intent as defined in the case law, and the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 7, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139074 - 2015-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 7, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139074 - 2015-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 We certified the case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which reversed the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144457 - 2015-07-15
. ¶7 We certified the case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which reversed the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144457 - 2015-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by another perpetrator was not exculpatory under the facts of this case, the circuit court erred by granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
by another perpetrator was not exculpatory under the facts of this case, the circuit court erred by granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27