Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29741 - 29750 of 51576 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

State v. Willy J. Love
effective assistance of counsel because his trial lawyer did not attempt to impeach a police officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
concerning the effect of the drugs Sandra testified she took constituted extraneous prejudicial information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8171 - 2017-09-19

State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
. Heitkemper argues that Sams's statements during deliberations concerning the effect of the drugs Sandra
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8171 - 2005-03-31

Kurt A. Gorman v. John P. Dahlberg
court’s initial order allowing Jensen to appear pro hac vice on his behalf was of no legal effect because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7493 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI App 35
that the stay under this provision is in effect for only a reasonable period of time. Thus, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35499 - 2009-03-24

[PDF] WI APP 119
); 1979 Wis. Laws, ch. 323, §§ 28, 34 (effective July 1, 1980). The statute was again repealed and re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67352 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Robb W. Jensen v. School District of Rhinelander
contract. The board placed Jensen on administrative leave with pay and benefits, effective July 1, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4159 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
that a defendant be informed of consequences collateral to the plea.” Id. In assessing whether the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52100 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kurt A. Gorman v. John P. Dahlberg
initial order allowing Jensen to appear pro hac vice on his behalf was of no legal effect because Jensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7493 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Charles A. Mikrut v. State
for the delivery charge was signed on May 2, 1986, but was effective nunc pro tunc to April 3, 1986, since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11447 - 2017-09-19