Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29751 - 29760 of 38914 for c's.
Search results 29751 - 29760 of 38914 for c's.
[PDF]
State v. Michael Erickson
. 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to s. 752.31(2)(c), Stats. NO. 96-2318-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11260 - 2017-09-19
. 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to s. 752.31(2)(c), Stats. NO. 96-2318-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11260 - 2017-09-19
Sauk County v. Robert M. Engelhardt
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2] If the accused does not want the agency’s secondary test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14476 - 2005-03-31
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2] If the accused does not want the agency’s secondary test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14476 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the eighth theft exceeded $5,000, making it a Class H felony. See WIS. STAT. § 943.20(3)(bm)-(c). ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15
of the eighth theft exceeded $5,000, making it a Class H felony. See WIS. STAT. § 943.20(3)(bm)-(c). ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32752 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 105
that this appeal is frivolous pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(c)2. We deny the motion. To be frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51987 - 2010-08-24
that this appeal is frivolous pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(c)2. We deny the motion. To be frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51987 - 2010-08-24
State v. Gregory A. Allen
direct appeal. C. Prowling ¶14 Allen next argues that his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2966 - 2005-03-31
direct appeal. C. Prowling ¶14 Allen next argues that his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2966 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christa Brojanac
] This is a one-judge appeal pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2963 - 2005-03-31
] This is a one-judge appeal pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2963 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
either party is legally obligated to support. (c) If the parties were married, the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30147 - 2007-09-04
either party is legally obligated to support. (c) If the parties were married, the standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30147 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID C. SWANSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
-RESPONDENTS. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID C. SWANSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666528 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
State v. Frankie Groenke
Groenke’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.2 C. Interests of Justice. Groenke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
Groenke’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.2 C. Interests of Justice. Groenke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. App. 1989) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground[.]”). Nos. 2023AP1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023107 - 2025-10-14
. App. 1989) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground[.]”). Nos. 2023AP1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023107 - 2025-10-14