Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29751 - 29760 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 29751 - 29760 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Wilfredo Melo
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm. No. 96-1907-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm. No. 96-1907-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
John O. Shaline v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
damage to their apartment building. State Farm contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3728 - 2005-03-31
damage to their apartment building. State Farm contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3728 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a firearm following the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion. Navarrete challenges the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111775 - 2017-09-21
of a firearm following the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion. Navarrete challenges the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111775 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shawn E. Avery
). Avery pled no contest to the offense after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
). Avery pled no contest to the offense after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicially deficient. We agree with the trial court on both issues and affirm. Facts ¶2 On August 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138445 - 2017-09-21
was prejudicially deficient. We agree with the trial court on both issues and affirm. Facts ¶2 On August 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138445 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Shoop v. Samuel Carrasco
. In particular, the court noted that a sheriff’s deputy testified at trial that Shoop told him at the accident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4147 - 2005-03-31
. In particular, the court noted that a sheriff’s deputy testified at trial that Shoop told him at the accident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4147 - 2005-03-31
Taylor Vincent Powers v. Terry Dachel
Company. The trial court dismissed this action after concluding that the Dachels, as landowners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13588 - 2005-03-31
Company. The trial court dismissed this action after concluding that the Dachels, as landowners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A key witness for the State, Zachary Schmidlkofer, testified at trial under a grant of full use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193119 - 2017-09-21
A key witness for the State, Zachary Schmidlkofer, testified at trial under a grant of full use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193119 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark J. Tilot
for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 2 a.m. on August 24, 2003, off-duty Brown County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19980 - 2017-09-21
for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 2 a.m. on August 24, 2003, off-duty Brown County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19980 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CSO Servicing Corporation v. City of Eau Claire
in favor of the City of Eau Claire. CSO asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8361 - 2017-09-19
in favor of the City of Eau Claire. CSO asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8361 - 2017-09-19