Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29761 - 29770 of 62378 for child support.
Search results 29761 - 29770 of 62378 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
as a condition of a lengthy term of probation. In support, he presented testimony from family members who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
as a condition of a lengthy term of probation. In support, he presented testimony from family members who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
The court’s findings are supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. Counsel provided the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39049 - 2014-09-15
The court’s findings are supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. Counsel provided the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Valley Bank v. David V. Jennings III
that the summary judgment record does not support the reduction of the redemption period from twelve to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8337 - 2017-09-19
that the summary judgment record does not support the reduction of the redemption period from twelve to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8337 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, that the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to support his conviction. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=900801 - 2025-01-14
, that the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to support his conviction. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=900801 - 2025-01-14
[PDF]
State v. William D. Taylor
State v. Lukasik, 115 Wis. 2d 134, 340 N.W.2d 62 (Ct. App. 1983), the defendant may support his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3823 - 2017-09-20
State v. Lukasik, 115 Wis. 2d 134, 340 N.W.2d 62 (Ct. App. 1983), the defendant may support his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3823 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
TMI, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
there was no credible evidence to support the conclusion that the dancers' services were performed in an independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10521 - 2017-09-20
there was no credible evidence to support the conclusion that the dancers' services were performed in an independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10521 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
in its initial sentencing argument. Stephens cites no support for his proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32501 - 2008-04-22
in its initial sentencing argument. Stephens cites no support for his proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32501 - 2008-04-22
State v. Ilir Aliji
the marijuana. We reject this claim. [I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14150 - 2005-03-31
the marijuana. We reject this claim. [I]n reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14150 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Fowler
with affidavits stating that another prisoner had written some of his previous pro se motions, thus supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2950 - 2017-09-19
with affidavits stating that another prisoner had written some of his previous pro se motions, thus supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2950 - 2017-09-19
Susan H. Ripple v. R.F. Technologies, Inc.
circumstances. Susan does not cite to any authority to support this specific proposition and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4419 - 2005-03-31
circumstances. Susan does not cite to any authority to support this specific proposition and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4419 - 2005-03-31