Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29771 - 29780 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 29771 - 29780 of 58245 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
charges and one count of possession of a firearm against Morens. Shortly before trial, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141598 - 2015-05-11
charges and one count of possession of a firearm against Morens. Shortly before trial, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141598 - 2015-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
of the interviews. ¶3 At trial, defense counsel argued that Wessel was not with D.B. and A.H. when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144477 - 2015-07-15
of the interviews. ¶3 At trial, defense counsel argued that Wessel was not with D.B. and A.H. when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144477 - 2015-07-15
John O. Shaline v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
damage to their apartment building. State Farm contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3728 - 2005-03-31
damage to their apartment building. State Farm contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3728 - 2005-03-31
David Friedman v. Arnold J. Stueber
caused by the insured's intentional acts. The trial court dismissed Stueber's insurance company from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3100 - 2013-06-30
caused by the insured's intentional acts. The trial court dismissed Stueber's insurance company from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3100 - 2013-06-30
Barron County v. Brian T.
Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by strictly applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4618 - 2008-10-12
Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by strictly applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4618 - 2008-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying without a hearing his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective at sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204958 - 2017-12-13
an order denying without a hearing his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective at sentencing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204958 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in reviewing a trial court’s discretion from “abuse of discretion” to “erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-23
in reviewing a trial court’s discretion from “abuse of discretion” to “erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-23
Barron County v. Brian T.
Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by strictly applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4617 - 2005-03-31
Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by strictly applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4617 - 2005-03-31
Barron County v. Brian T.
Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by strictly applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4619 - 2005-03-31
Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by strictly applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4619 - 2005-03-31
State v. Montrell D. McDade
standard. We will find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19966 - 2005-10-17
standard. We will find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows that the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19966 - 2005-10-17