Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29781 - 29790 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 29781 - 29790 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Charles and Carolyn Mills v. Board of Review of The Town of Dover
at the hearing. Because the first four claims of error are predicated on the Millses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9404 - 2005-03-31
at the hearing. Because the first four claims of error are predicated on the Millses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9404 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The builder claimed the offer to purchase was unenforceable because it was ambiguous and there was no true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31963 - 2008-02-27
. The builder claimed the offer to purchase was unenforceable because it was ambiguous and there was no true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31963 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
at the time of his initial plea but claimed: “I always told my attorney that I needed an interpreter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
at the time of his initial plea but claimed: “I always told my attorney that I needed an interpreter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57484 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark H. Gabriel
Gabriel’s first claim is that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find him guilty of obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20531 - 2005-12-05
Gabriel’s first claim is that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find him guilty of obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20531 - 2005-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discern no arguable merit to a claim that Gilbert’s trial counsel was ineffective. Trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844437 - 2024-09-04
discern no arguable merit to a claim that Gilbert’s trial counsel was ineffective. Trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844437 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the probable cause statement included claims that Adams was observed with empty beer cans near him, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722015 - 2023-10-31
in the probable cause statement included claims that Adams was observed with empty beer cans near him, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722015 - 2023-10-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conviction. Smith filed a postconviction motion, seeking a new sentencing hearing. She claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251613 - 2019-12-18
conviction. Smith filed a postconviction motion, seeking a new sentencing hearing. She claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251613 - 2019-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, asserting his ignorance of the law when he accepted his plea.[2] Additionally, Gilmour claimed that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83842 - 2012-06-19
, asserting his ignorance of the law when he accepted his plea.[2] Additionally, Gilmour claimed that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83842 - 2012-06-19
State v. Frances Nienhardt
must decide, in light of the entire facts and circumstances, whether the claimed error is sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
must decide, in light of the entire facts and circumstances, whether the claimed error is sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stacey R.W.
if the parent convinces the trial court that he or she did not know of the right. Here, Stacey claims he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3132 - 2005-03-31
if the parent convinces the trial court that he or she did not know of the right. Here, Stacey claims he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3132 - 2005-03-31