Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29781 - 29790 of 62789 for child support.
Search results 29781 - 29790 of 62789 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). Although evidence supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). Although evidence supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
- was prosecuted impose strict liability; and (3) whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10425 - 2017-09-20
- was prosecuted impose strict liability; and (3) whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10425 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141953 - 2015-05-13
is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141953 - 2015-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the mental responsibility phase of the trial when there is no credible evidence in support of the defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87550 - 2012-09-26
the mental responsibility phase of the trial when there is no credible evidence in support of the defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87550 - 2012-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Milton L. Reed
that he was not told his options. The letter he received clearly supports a finding that Reed knew he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15162 - 2017-09-21
that he was not told his options. The letter he received clearly supports a finding that Reed knew he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Reginald Humphrey
in the previous case. In our previous decision, we concluded that “[t]he trial court’s findings support its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13332 - 2017-09-21
in the previous case. In our previous decision, we concluded that “[t]he trial court’s findings support its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard Winters v. Gary R. McCaughtry
of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact, so long as the fact is supported by substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7471 - 2017-09-20
of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact, so long as the fact is supported by substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7471 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the order. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On September 15, 2014, while Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136872 - 2017-09-21
to support the order. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On September 15, 2014, while Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136872 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randy A. Schill
later argued that Debra’s testimony supported the inference that “something’s placed in a drink
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4629 - 2005-03-31
later argued that Debra’s testimony supported the inference that “something’s placed in a drink
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4629 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the order. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On September 15, 2014, while Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136872 - 2015-03-10
to support the order. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On September 15, 2014, while Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136872 - 2015-03-10