Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2981 - 2990 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2981 - 2990 of 30059 for de.
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
, whether a settlement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
, whether a settlement is binding and thus enforceable by a court is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
patronage distributions to Creamery and Farm for calendar year 2011.” 3 We agree. ¶8 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132739 - 2017-09-21
patronage distributions to Creamery and Farm for calendar year 2011.” 3 We agree. ¶8 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132739 - 2017-09-21
County of Green Lake v. Paul J. Mertz
are mandatory.[5] This presents a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18269 - 2005-05-24
are mandatory.[5] This presents a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18269 - 2005-05-24
Margaret Anderson v. David Anderson
of the court’s decision. See Hughes, 223 Wis. 2d at 120. We review questions of law de novo. See id. Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
of the court’s decision. See Hughes, 223 Wis. 2d at 120. We review questions of law de novo. See id. Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16278 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
but did not make. Id. ¶9 Whether two parties are in privity is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63179 - 2011-04-26
but did not make. Id. ¶9 Whether two parties are in privity is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63179 - 2011-04-26
[PDF]
County of Green Lake v. Paul J. Mertz
a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105, ¶5, 254
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18269 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. Sveum, 2002 WI App 105, ¶5, 254
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18269 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Medina
). We review constitutional questions de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis.2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888, 893
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13376 - 2005-03-31
). We review constitutional questions de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis.2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888, 893
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13376 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
is that the referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53203 - 2010-08-09
is that the referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53203 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48498 - 2014-09-15
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48498 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo. State v. Rash, 2003 WI App 32, ¶5, 260 Wis. 2d 369, 659 N.W.2d 189 (“whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209072 - 2018-03-01
is reviewed de novo. State v. Rash, 2003 WI App 32, ¶5, 260 Wis. 2d 369, 659 N.W.2d 189 (“whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209072 - 2018-03-01