Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2981 - 2990 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 2981 - 2990 of 65039 for timed.
State v. James L. Allen
Allen's subsequent motion for sentence modification. In that motion, for the first time, Allen contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9383 - 2005-03-31
Allen's subsequent motion for sentence modification. In that motion, for the first time, Allen contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Allen
Allen's subsequent motion for sentence modification. In that motion, for the first time, Allen contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9383 - 2017-09-19
Allen's subsequent motion for sentence modification. In that motion, for the first time, Allen contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9383 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jennifer R. Gieck
to be in existence at the time of the offenses. We therefore affirm. ¶2 Gieck was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5430 - 2005-03-31
to be in existence at the time of the offenses. We therefore affirm. ¶2 Gieck was arrested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5430 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer R. Gieck
of the crimes which needed to be in existence at the time of the offenses. We therefore affirm. ¶2 Gieck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5430 - 2017-09-19
of the crimes which needed to be in existence at the time of the offenses. We therefore affirm. ¶2 Gieck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5430 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The issue is whether Johnson timely commenced judicial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109051 - 2014-03-10
was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The issue is whether Johnson timely commenced judicial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109051 - 2014-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
the DNA surcharge imposed by the circuit court at the time of his original judgment of conviction in 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64239 - 2011-05-16
the DNA surcharge imposed by the circuit court at the time of his original judgment of conviction in 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64239 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
Norbert Grenchik v. Door County Board of Adjustment
it was untimely.1 They argue that their petition was timely because the statutory time limit commenced upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10889 - 2017-09-20
it was untimely.1 They argue that their petition was timely because the statutory time limit commenced upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10889 - 2017-09-20
Norbert Grenchik v. Door County Board of Adjustment
court because it was untimely.[1] They argue that their petition was timely because the statutory time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10889 - 2005-03-31
court because it was untimely.[1] They argue that their petition was timely because the statutory time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10889 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
addresses the award of sentence credit for the time a criminal defendant spends in jail while awaiting trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52056 - 2010-07-13
addresses the award of sentence credit for the time a criminal defendant spends in jail while awaiting trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52056 - 2010-07-13
[PDF]
WI 77
, C.J. This case addresses the award of sentence credit for the time a criminal defendant spends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52056 - 2014-09-15
, C.J. This case addresses the award of sentence credit for the time a criminal defendant spends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52056 - 2014-09-15