Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29801 - 29810 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 29801 - 29810 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Steven E. Mariades v. Marquette County
in a case raising similar issues regarding the application and interaction of §§ 893.80(4) and 81.15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13354 - 2017-09-21
in a case raising similar issues regarding the application and interaction of §§ 893.80(4) and 81.15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13354 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 32
2019 WI App 32 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239879 - 2019-07-08
2019 WI App 32 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239879 - 2019-07-08
[PDF]
State v. Ronald V. McCallum
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9139 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9139 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was not retroactively applicable to his case and, in any event, his motion was precluded. We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36148 - 2009-04-13
was not retroactively applicable to his case and, in any event, his motion was precluded. We agree with the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36148 - 2009-04-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268211 - 2020-07-09
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268211 - 2020-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the 2016 order.” Id., ¶14 (quoted source omitted).3 ¶7 S.A.M. seeks to distinguish this case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284520 - 2020-09-15
to the 2016 order.” Id., ¶14 (quoted source omitted).3 ¶7 S.A.M. seeks to distinguish this case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284520 - 2020-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Murray
under the circumstances presented by this case to set a parole eligibility date if I sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
under the circumstances presented by this case to set a parole eligibility date if I sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” based on the particular facts of the case. See id., ¶9. ¶11 In arguing that the condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256702 - 2020-03-17
” based on the particular facts of the case. See id., ¶9. ¶11 In arguing that the condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256702 - 2020-03-17
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
, Stats. Nos. 98-0307 and 98-0308 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. Nos. 98-0307 and 98-0308 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
, Stats. Nos. 98-0307 and 98-0308 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13583 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. Nos. 98-0307 and 98-0308 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13583 - 2005-03-31