Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29811 - 29820 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 29811 - 29820 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
” at Williams’s trial. Turner’s lawyer in the federal case told the trial court here: “When Mr. Turner started
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113463 - 2014-06-02
” at Williams’s trial. Turner’s lawyer in the federal case told the trial court here: “When Mr. Turner started
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113463 - 2014-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. At issue in this case is Brown’s contention that the trial court should have granted his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51174 - 2010-06-21
. At issue in this case is Brown’s contention that the trial court should have granted his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51174 - 2010-06-21
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct case. The State argues, and the circuit court agreed, that the evidence would have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36411 - 2009-05-06
conduct case. The State argues, and the circuit court agreed, that the evidence would have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36411 - 2009-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. The court also found that the evidence was not unduly prejudicial. ¶16 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56014 - 2010-10-27
in this case. The court also found that the evidence was not unduly prejudicial. ¶16 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56014 - 2010-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
2008 WI App 167 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP89 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34393 - 2008-11-11
2008 WI App 167 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP89 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34393 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - 4/2/24 Court Order
Case 2023AP001399 4/2/24 Court Order Filed 04-02-2024 Page 1 of 4 Page 2 April 2, 2024
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0402courtorder.pdf - 2024-04-02
Case 2023AP001399 4/2/24 Court Order Filed 04-02-2024 Page 1 of 4 Page 2 April 2, 2024
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0402courtorder.pdf - 2024-04-02
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - 1-17-24 Court Order
01-17-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 1-17-24 Court Order Filed 01-17-2024
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011724courtorder.pdf - 2024-01-17
01-17-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 1-17-24 Court Order Filed 01-17-2024
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011724courtorder.pdf - 2024-01-17
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - 03-08-2024 Court Order
FILED 03-08-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 03-08-2024 Court Order Filed 03
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0308order.pdf - 2024-03-08
FILED 03-08-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 03-08-2024 Court Order Filed 03
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0308order.pdf - 2024-03-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is unconstitutional. Although the circuit court followed controlling case law at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75591 - 2014-09-15
in this case is unconstitutional. Although the circuit court followed controlling case law at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75591 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Sophia’s counsel attended the next hearing in this case, on April 4, 2011. At this hearing, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78632 - 2012-02-28
Sophia’s counsel attended the next hearing in this case, on April 4, 2011. At this hearing, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78632 - 2012-02-28