Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29811 - 29820 of 67826 for law.

[PDF] Pamela Jones v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
its discretionary decision upon an error of law. Id. Resolution of this case turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19587 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. Dan A. Buchler
it acted according to law, whether the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7955 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 610. The bank’s bid was based on a mistaken view of what the law required. The bank’s credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63340 - 2014-09-15

Renee J. Stibbe v. Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
to follow the trial court’s instruction on a point of law or the verdict reflects highly emotional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13901 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brady B.
he was denied equal protection of the law when he was prosecuted while the female who willingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14191 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the statute of frauds.2 Whether a document complies with the statute of frauds is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62771 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kenneth M. W.
It is a question of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James J. Bethel v. Diana J. Hewson
it is a product of a rational mental process by which facts of record and the law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11437 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
: the State had the discretion to refile the charges dismissed without prejudice in 2014. The law supports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421986 - 2021-09-08

Daniel D. Drow v. David H. Schwarz
the application of law to undisputed facts. It therefore presents a question of law reviewed de novo. Ball v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12686 - 2005-03-31