Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29821 - 29830 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 29821 - 29830 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Lorenzo H.
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roy McGee
without a hearing because his claims were mere conclusory allegations. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10207 - 2005-03-31
without a hearing because his claims were mere conclusory allegations. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10207 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and irrelevant information, namely, Blough’s statement. The court held that the record did not support his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36585 - 2009-05-26
and irrelevant information, namely, Blough’s statement. The court held that the record did not support his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36585 - 2009-05-26
State v. Paul P.
commission of a battery, and from an order denying his motions for postadjudication relief.[2] He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11018 - 2005-03-31
commission of a battery, and from an order denying his motions for postadjudication relief.[2] He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11018 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Terrence J. Woods v.
to that client’s claim and file a complaint or take other steps to further that client’s interests and respond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17385 - 2017-09-21
to that client’s claim and file a complaint or take other steps to further that client’s interests and respond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17385 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the professional standard of care in light of Roehl’s claim that someone else was actually driving his car during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34767 - 2008-12-03
the professional standard of care in light of Roehl’s claim that someone else was actually driving his car during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34767 - 2008-12-03
State v. Linda J.
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12554 - 2005-03-31
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12554 - 2005-03-31
State v. John W. Moore
, arising from separate incidents at two University of Wisconsin-Madison campus libraries. Moore claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11607 - 2005-03-31
, arising from separate incidents at two University of Wisconsin-Madison campus libraries. Moore claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11607 - 2005-03-31
Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
condemnation action against the DOT under § 32.10, Stats., in which Selgren claimed that its real estate “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31
condemnation action against the DOT under § 32.10, Stats., in which Selgren claimed that its real estate “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31