Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29821 - 29830 of 68288 for law.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conclude law enforcement had reasonable suspicion that Hebert was operating his vehicle while intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205934 - 2017-12-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Moskopf violate any traffic laws. ¶4 The circuit court granted Moskopf’s motion to suppress, ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109824 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
considered the pertinent facts, applied the correct law, and reached a reasonable determination, it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499360 - 2022-03-30

[PDF] State v. Stephen E. Lee
permitted by § 939.62. We reject Lee’s argument because Wisconsin law envisions the very kind of sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5946 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James Darnell Golden v. Joseph F. Black
is discretionary, we will affirm if the trial court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15705 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Irene Stussy v. North Crawford School District
and circumstances of each case, and if the instruction given adequately covers the law, we will not find error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15084 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas C. Smith
it was “in excess of the maximum term authorized by law.” The circuit court denied Smith’s motion and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4555 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Janice D.
judge, was convicted of murdering the law partner of a man who defeated him for reelection. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6781 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI 17
: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Joseph L. Sommers, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35596 - 2014-09-15

State v. Joseph G.
in the restitution order is a question of law which we review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 162 Wis.2d 862, 869, 471
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13133 - 2005-03-31