Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29841 - 29850 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 29841 - 29850 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
has shown a prima facie violation of § 971.08 or other mandatory duties, and alleges that he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
has shown a prima facie violation of § 971.08 or other mandatory duties, and alleges that he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
State v. John T. Trochinski, Jr.
are satisfied that the trial court properly discharged its duty under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3046 - 2005-03-31
are satisfied that the trial court properly discharged its duty under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3046 - 2005-03-31
State v. Heather M. M.
between the court and the district attorney when considering the duties assigned to each by Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4002 - 2005-03-31
between the court and the district attorney when considering the duties assigned to each by Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4002 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Rock v. Carol L. Poff-Mills
enforcement officer not met, or exceeded his or her duty under 343.305(4) and 343.305(4m) to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11075 - 2017-09-19
enforcement officer not met, or exceeded his or her duty under 343.305(4) and 343.305(4m) to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11075 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. James
the law enforcement officer not met, or exceeded his or her duty under §§ 343.305(4) and 343.305(4m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7652 - 2017-09-19
the law enforcement officer not met, or exceeded his or her duty under §§ 343.305(4) and 343.305(4m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7652 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of witnesses and alone is charged with the duty of weighing the evidence. Id. at 506. The fact finder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33104 - 2008-06-23
of witnesses and alone is charged with the duty of weighing the evidence. Id. at 506. The fact finder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33104 - 2008-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
signed, satisfied the court’s mandatory duties to personally address Alsum and determine information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218621 - 2018-08-31
signed, satisfied the court’s mandatory duties to personally address Alsum and determine information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218621 - 2018-08-31
G-Store, Inc. v. Department of Commerce
contend that it was misled by the different terminology, such that it misunderstood its duty imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4182 - 2005-03-31
contend that it was misled by the different terminology, such that it misunderstood its duty imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
breached its duty of representation to the Hutchinsons. Ultimately, KMK moved for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260478 - 2020-05-19
breached its duty of representation to the Hutchinsons. Ultimately, KMK moved for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260478 - 2020-05-19
State v. Terry L. Marshall
, by police duties apart from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to a potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13312 - 2005-03-31
, by police duties apart from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to a potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13312 - 2005-03-31