Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29851 - 29860 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29851 - 29860 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.
Frontsheet
enhancer under Wis. Stat. ยง 939.645(1) and (2)(a).[3] The defendant filed a motion to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36528 - 2009-05-18
enhancer under Wis. Stat. ยง 939.645(1) and (2)(a).[3] The defendant filed a motion to dismiss
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36528 - 2009-05-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals an order denying a motion to reopen his challenge to a 2008 property tax assessment. Slocum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112630 - 2017-09-21
, appeals an order denying a motion to reopen his challenge to a 2008 property tax assessment. Slocum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112630 - 2017-09-21
State v. Craig A. Felten
appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3917 - 2005-03-31
appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3917 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the no-merit report. The time for Regan to file a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134592 - 2017-09-21
in the no-merit report. The time for Regan to file a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134592 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas G. Larson
, P.J.[1] Thomas Larson appeals an order denying his motion to dismiss the complaint against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5754 - 2005-03-31
, P.J.[1] Thomas Larson appeals an order denying his motion to dismiss the complaint against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5754 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael V.H.
payment of $68 biweekly. On September 8, 1999, the State filed a contempt motion contending that Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3362 - 2005-03-31
payment of $68 biweekly. On September 8, 1999, the State filed a contempt motion contending that Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3362 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig Shelton Hayes
. Hayes claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He argues that City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13234 - 2005-03-31
. Hayes claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He argues that City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13234 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the motion is procedurally barred because we rejected the same resentencing and correlative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52521 - 2010-07-26
conclude that the motion is procedurally barred because we rejected the same resentencing and correlative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52521 - 2010-07-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He seeks to withdraw his no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220393 - 2018-10-10
of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He seeks to withdraw his no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220393 - 2018-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of an intoxicant (OWI), fifth offense. He contends the circuit court erred when it denied his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06
of an intoxicant (OWI), fifth offense. He contends the circuit court erred when it denied his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872492 - 2024-11-06