Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29861 - 29870 of 82991 for simple case.
Search results 29861 - 29870 of 82991 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
referred the case to the district attorney’s office, which received the referral on February 16, 2005, five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
referred the case to the district attorney’s office, which received the referral on February 16, 2005, five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30217 - 2007-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, § 21(2) of the Wisconsin Constitution, Wisconsin SCR 11.02(1), and case law. A circuit court may adopt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89101 - 2012-11-13
, § 21(2) of the Wisconsin Constitution, Wisconsin SCR 11.02(1), and case law. A circuit court may adopt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89101 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case concerns a one-acre parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case concerns a one-acre parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199213 - 2017-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
this case for further proceedings. Background ¶2 On March 10, 2005, Aubry was travelling southbound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32731 - 2008-05-19
this case for further proceedings. Background ¶2 On March 10, 2005, Aubry was travelling southbound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32731 - 2008-05-19
State v. Leroy W. Senn
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182782 - 2017-09-21
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182782 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael W. Farrell
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1179-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1179-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon R. Torres
2003 WI App 199 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6100 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 199 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-0233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6100 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. In this case, Pieters testified, an ethanol test was conducted by analyst Dan McManaway. McManaway’s test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145573 - 2015-08-04
. In this case, Pieters testified, an ethanol test was conducted by analyst Dan McManaway. McManaway’s test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145573 - 2015-08-04
2008 WI APP 48
2008 WI App 48 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1048 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31857 - 2008-03-18
2008 WI App 48 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1048 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31857 - 2008-03-18