Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29871 - 29880 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 29871 - 29880 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Lisa K. Lepak v. Bryan D. Johnvin
Lepak (Lepak). The appellants argue that the trial court erroneously held that it was the plaintiff's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8656 - 2017-09-19
Lepak (Lepak). The appellants argue that the trial court erroneously held that it was the plaintiff's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8656 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Shawn E. Avery
the trial court denied his motion to 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4227 - 2017-09-19
the trial court denied his motion to 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4227 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a new trial based on a violation of his right to disclosure of exculpatory evidence under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175612 - 2017-09-21
to a new trial based on a violation of his right to disclosure of exculpatory evidence under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175612 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 BRENNAN, P.J. 1 Marie Martin appeals the trial court’s order denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181361 - 2017-09-21
, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 BRENNAN, P.J. 1 Marie Martin appeals the trial court’s order denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181361 - 2017-09-21
State v. Prentiss M. McKinnie
to appeal.[1] Prentiss M. McKinnie appeals a nonfinal order of the trial court denying his motion to bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4489 - 2005-03-31
to appeal.[1] Prentiss M. McKinnie appeals a nonfinal order of the trial court denying his motion to bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4489 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Shoop v. Samuel Carrasco
. In particular, the court noted that a sheriff’s deputy testified at trial that Shoop told him at the accident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4147 - 2005-03-31
. In particular, the court noted that a sheriff’s deputy testified at trial that Shoop told him at the accident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4147 - 2005-03-31
Shirley A. Gemas v. Susan R. Meyer
. The Gemases’ first argument is that the trial court’s entry of the amount of past medical expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12150 - 2005-03-31
. The Gemases’ first argument is that the trial court’s entry of the amount of past medical expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12150 - 2005-03-31
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
to terminate was made after a trial court found that grounds existed for termination based upon child abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31
to terminate was made after a trial court found that grounds existed for termination based upon child abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott R. Weber
under the law. Finally, Scott challenges the trial court’s decision regarding probation in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
under the law. Finally, Scott challenges the trial court’s decision regarding probation in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael S. R.
, respectively. A court trial took place on August 30, 2004. During the trial, the circuit court heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20578 - 2005-12-13
, respectively. A court trial took place on August 30, 2004. During the trial, the circuit court heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20578 - 2005-12-13