Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29881 - 29890 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 29881 - 29890 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the denial of his motion to suppress. Lind contends the circuit court erred by finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122864 - 2014-09-30
the denial of his motion to suppress. Lind contends the circuit court erred by finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122864 - 2014-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Frank Starich
-trial motions including one to “dismiss for lack of probable cause.” The motion stated that Starich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3041 - 2017-09-19
-trial motions including one to “dismiss for lack of probable cause.” The motion stated that Starich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3041 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112199 - 2014-05-12
. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112199 - 2014-05-12
W. George Bowring v. Wisconsin Divison of Transportation
, Stats.[4] On or about March 21, 1996, plaintiffs filed a notice of motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11016 - 2005-03-31
, Stats.[4] On or about March 21, 1996, plaintiffs filed a notice of motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11016 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 As set forth in the complaint, which served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190341 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 As set forth in the complaint, which served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190341 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shaun E. Kelley
). Kelley claims the trial court erred in No. 2004AP1880-CR 2 denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
). Kelley claims the trial court erred in No. 2004AP1880-CR 2 denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2009-10)[1] motion. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas to two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91546 - 2013-01-14
. § 974.06 (2009-10)[1] motion. He argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas to two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91546 - 2013-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it was sufficient as to each offense. The no-merit report addresses the circuit court’s denial of two motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348653 - 2021-03-25
that it was sufficient as to each offense. The no-merit report addresses the circuit court’s denial of two motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348653 - 2021-03-25
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
denying his motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02),[1] alleging that he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02),[1] alleging that he was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Ward asserts that certain post-sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82322 - 2012-05-14
denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Ward asserts that certain post-sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82322 - 2012-05-14