Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29881 - 29890 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 29881 - 29890 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
that he was drinking. We disagree. As part of his official duties, Fitzgerald works specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5746 - 2017-09-19
that he was drinking. We disagree. As part of his official duties, Fitzgerald works specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5746 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Integrity Mutual Insurance Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
great weight deference when the agency has the duty to administer a statute; the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2850 - 2017-09-19
great weight deference when the agency has the duty to administer a statute; the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2850 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appointed counsel discharges the duty of representation. See State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178530 - 2017-09-21
appointed counsel discharges the duty of representation. See State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178530 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
mandatory duties, and alleges that he or she in fact did not know or understand the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46458 - 2014-09-15
mandatory duties, and alleges that he or she in fact did not know or understand the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46458 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
colloquy was defective,” or that the “court failed to conform to its mandatory duties during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43959 - 2009-12-01
colloquy was defective,” or that the “court failed to conform to its mandatory duties during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43959 - 2009-12-01
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Boris Ouchakof
comply with the provisions of current SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16609 - 2005-03-31
comply with the provisions of current SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16609 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ralph D. Smythe
was not a defense in a refusal hearing. We said that the form was not confusing, that the officer’s duty was only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13222 - 2017-09-21
was not a defense in a refusal hearing. We said that the form was not confusing, that the officer’s duty was only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13222 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 47
ORDERED that Kristine A. Peshek comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66464 - 2014-09-15
ORDERED that Kristine A. Peshek comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66464 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Geoffrey Chapman
or her window. The occupant is under no duty to roll down the window to talk to a citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4333 - 2017-09-19
or her window. The occupant is under no duty to roll down the window to talk to a citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4333 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey J. Muschinske
the trial court’s conformance with § 971.08, STATS., and other court-ordered duties; and (2) a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15027 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s conformance with § 971.08, STATS., and other court-ordered duties; and (2) a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15027 - 2017-09-21