Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29891 - 29900 of 37779 for d's.
Search results 29891 - 29900 of 37779 for d's.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the petition, the proposed disposition of the property, and the reasons for the disposition. (d) The wishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123235 - 2014-10-06
of the petition, the proposed disposition of the property, and the reasons for the disposition. (d) The wishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123235 - 2014-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it was No. 2020AP1068-CR 6 read to her and that he was “surprise[d]” because he “was not informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02
it was No. 2020AP1068-CR 6 read to her and that he was “surprise[d]” because he “was not informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The second factor in Jaimes is whether the comment on the failure to testify “propose[d] that the failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514533 - 2022-04-26
The second factor in Jaimes is whether the comment on the failure to testify “propose[d] that the failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=514533 - 2022-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Olton Lee Dumas
of Article I, section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution, and § 968.07(1)(d), STATS. A police officer has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10619 - 2017-09-20
of Article I, section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution, and § 968.07(1)(d), STATS. A police officer has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10619 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. Code § DOC 303.76(7)(d) provides that the warden’s decision on a disciplinary appeal “is final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
. Code § DOC 303.76(7)(d) provides that the warden’s decision on a disciplinary appeal “is final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
Malaikham Bounpraseuth v. David Lewis
decision. D. De Novo Review. ¶21 Lewis’s last claim is that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21713 - 2006-03-13
decision. D. De Novo Review. ¶21 Lewis’s last claim is that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21713 - 2006-03-13
CA Blank Order
was thirty years. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.06(1), 939.50(3)(d), 939.63(1)(b). Lowe’s sentence is within
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136772 - 2015-03-03
was thirty years. See Wis. Stat. §§ 940.06(1), 939.50(3)(d), 939.63(1)(b). Lowe’s sentence is within
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136772 - 2015-03-03
Corey J. Hampton v. David H. Schwarz
decision to revoke Hampton. The decision was neither arbitrary nor capricious. D. Alternatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3694 - 2005-03-31
decision to revoke Hampton. The decision was neither arbitrary nor capricious. D. Alternatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3694 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. §§ 940.02(2)(a) and 961.41(1)(d)4. (2003-04). He also appeals the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62848 - 2011-04-13
. Stat. §§ 940.02(2)(a) and 961.41(1)(d)4. (2003-04). He also appeals the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62848 - 2011-04-13
State v. Razzie Watson, Sr.
in prison?” and “[D]o you also understand … that you are a repeater as that term is defined in the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4456 - 2005-03-31
in prison?” and “[D]o you also understand … that you are a repeater as that term is defined in the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4456 - 2005-03-31