Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29891 - 29900 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 29891 - 29900 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
from raising this claim. ΒΆ3 Gray next argues that the State used a falsified petition to waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45827 - 2010-01-19
from raising this claim. ΒΆ3 Gray next argues that the State used a falsified petition to waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45827 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at sentencing; and (5) he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claims. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566311 - 2022-09-20
at sentencing; and (5) he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claims. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566311 - 2022-09-20
[PDF]
State v. David C. Haubrich
claims that the trial court erred in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.1 We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2198 - 2017-09-19
claims that the trial court erred in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.1 We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2198 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation v. Dennis Maxberry
). No. 2006AP142 2 decipher. It appears that Maxberry is claiming that: (1) the underlying contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26375 - 2017-09-21
). No. 2006AP142 2 decipher. It appears that Maxberry is claiming that: (1) the underlying contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26375 - 2017-09-21
Professional Pest Control v. Tony Shomberg
. SUNDBY, J. This is an appeal[1] from a small claims judgment. The defendant-appellant, Tony Shomberg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8645 - 2011-07-25
. SUNDBY, J. This is an appeal[1] from a small claims judgment. The defendant-appellant, Tony Shomberg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8645 - 2011-07-25
Peter J. Kairis v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
a judgment affirming a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission dismissing his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10599 - 2005-03-31
a judgment affirming a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission dismissing his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
29 0 0 29 0 3 Small Claims (Contested) 95% 4 51 20 4 75 56 20 0 76 5 8 TOTAL CIVIL 96% 136 361 33 5
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty17.pdf - 2018-02-09
29 0 0 29 0 3 Small Claims (Contested) 95% 4 51 20 4 75 56 20 0 76 5 8 TOTAL CIVIL 96% 136 361 33 5
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty17.pdf - 2018-02-09
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
3 Other Family 88% 2 24 1 0 25 19 1 0 20 (2) 5 Small Claims (Contested) 101% 18 69 2 22 93 97 2 0
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty15.pdf - 2016-02-25
3 Other Family 88% 2 24 1 0 25 19 1 0 20 (2) 5 Small Claims (Contested) 101% 18 69 2 22 93 97 2 0
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty15.pdf - 2016-02-25
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
0 0 30 31 0 0 31 (1) 1 Small Claims (Contested) 117% 17 53 4 12 69 84 4 0 88 6 4 TOTAL CIVIL 109
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty16.pdf - 2017-03-07
0 0 30 31 0 0 31 (1) 1 Small Claims (Contested) 117% 17 53 4 12 69 84 4 0 88 6 4 TOTAL CIVIL 109
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty16.pdf - 2017-03-07
[PDF]
Clearanance rate: county and district
37 17 0 1 18 (5) 17 Small Claims (Contested) 73% 4 36 0 15 51 34 0 0 34 (3) 18 TOTAL CIVIL 96% 138
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty14.pdf - 2015-03-05
37 17 0 1 18 (5) 17 Small Claims (Contested) 73% 4 36 0 15 51 34 0 0 34 (3) 18 TOTAL CIVIL 96% 138
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty14.pdf - 2015-03-05