Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29891 - 29900 of 58532 for speedy trial.
Search results 29891 - 29900 of 58532 for speedy trial.
State v. Patrick A. Saunders
excusing the jury, the circuit court engaged in a colloquy with the prosecutor and Saunders' trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16472 - 2014-09-23
excusing the jury, the circuit court engaged in a colloquy with the prosecutor and Saunders' trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16472 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
Scott F. Anderson v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
addresses the specific arguments of the parties. Attorney Anderson posits that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20
addresses the specific arguments of the parties. Attorney Anderson posits that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20
State v. Tecia D.B.
, under § 48.415(5). Tecia requested a court trial and, on January 23, 2003, the court found that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6838 - 2005-03-31
, under § 48.415(5). Tecia requested a court trial and, on January 23, 2003, the court found that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6838 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
indicated she wanted to enter a plea because she did not think she would get a fair trial, Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134578 - 2015-02-03
indicated she wanted to enter a plea because she did not think she would get a fair trial, Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134578 - 2015-02-03
[PDF]
Armin Nankin v. Village of Shorewood
, §§ 31 and 18 of the Wisconsin Constitution. The trial court concluded that Nankin failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15418 - 2017-09-21
, §§ 31 and 18 of the Wisconsin Constitution. The trial court concluded that Nankin failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15418 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andrew L. Reiman
HOOVER, P.J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals orders suppressing a statement and the future trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21404 - 2006-02-13
HOOVER, P.J.[1] The State of Wisconsin appeals orders suppressing a statement and the future trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21404 - 2006-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
for a class C felony. Schmaling pled not guilty. ¶4 On the day of trial, Schmaling requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
for a class C felony. Schmaling pled not guilty. ¶4 On the day of trial, Schmaling requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
State v. Tecia D.B.
, under § 48.415(5). Tecia requested a court trial and, on January 23, 2003, the court found that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6835 - 2005-03-31
, under § 48.415(5). Tecia requested a court trial and, on January 23, 2003, the court found that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6835 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
and services of the court, under § 48.415(5). Tecia requested a court trial and, on January 23, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6836 - 2017-09-20
and services of the court, under § 48.415(5). Tecia requested a court trial and, on January 23, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6836 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
could argue that trial counsel’s conduct “fell below the reasonable standard when he failed to advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29
could argue that trial counsel’s conduct “fell below the reasonable standard when he failed to advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732531 - 2023-11-29