Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 17421 for Cost.
05-01 Public Hearing re Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.001(3) Relating to Cost Assessments in
for Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.001(3) Relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer Regulation System
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19518 - 2005-08-31
for Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.001(3) Relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer Regulation System
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19518 - 2005-08-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court rules petition 12-10
of the Petition For Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments in the Lawyer
/supreme/docs/1210petition.pdf - 2012-09-12
of the Petition For Amendment to Supreme Court Rule 22.24 Relating to Costs Assessments in the Lawyer
/supreme/docs/1210petition.pdf - 2012-09-12
Jim Smith v. Tracy Williams
that “will or has become a lien” on Smith’s property for the cost of razing his buildings. Finally, Smith alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3393 - 2005-03-31
that “will or has become a lien” on Smith’s property for the cost of razing his buildings. Finally, Smith alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jim Smith v. Tracy Williams
, [and] oppressive” the amount that “will or has become a lien” on Smith’s property for the cost of razing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3393 - 2017-09-19
, [and] oppressive” the amount that “will or has become a lien” on Smith’s property for the cost of razing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3393 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 13-15 supporting memo
concern about the cost of appointed counsel. The testimony of the 23 supporters of Petition 10-08
/supreme/docs/1315petitionsupport.pdf - 2013-09-30
concern about the cost of appointed counsel. The testimony of the 23 supporters of Petition 10-08
/supreme/docs/1315petitionsupport.pdf - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Ronald W. Hendree
that the costs of the reinstatement proceedings, which are $6123.29 as of August 19, 2005, be paid by Hendree
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20056 - 2017-09-21
that the costs of the reinstatement proceedings, which are $6123.29 as of August 19, 2005, be paid by Hendree
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20056 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas J. Awen v.
payments. Finally, the referee recommended that Attorney Awen be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17151 - 2017-09-21
payments. Finally, the referee recommended that Attorney Awen be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17151 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary A. Miller
conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which are $5486.86, as of July 21, 2005, should be assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24
conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which are $5486.86, as of July 21, 2005, should be assessed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
appeal. We awarded Smith the costs and reasonable attorney fees associated with the frivolous appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16162 - 2005-03-31
appeal. We awarded Smith the costs and reasonable attorney fees associated with the frivolous appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 19-06
) is amended to insert the following comment after that subsection: Comment Costs regarding the petition
/supreme/docs/1906petition.pdf - 2019-03-14
) is amended to insert the following comment after that subsection: Comment Costs regarding the petition
/supreme/docs/1906petition.pdf - 2019-03-14