Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 17369 for Cost.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 17369 for Cost.
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
and that he should not have been revoked for failure to pay court-ordered costs.[5] Within his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13111 - 2005-03-31
and that he should not have been revoked for failure to pay court-ordered costs.[5] Within his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13111 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James H. Martin
that the Board had urged. The referee also recommended that Attorney Martin be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17481 - 2005-03-31
that the Board had urged. The referee also recommended that Attorney Martin be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 19-06
) is amended to insert the following comment after that subsection: Comment Costs regarding the petition
/supreme/docs/1906petition.pdf - 2019-03-14
) is amended to insert the following comment after that subsection: Comment Costs regarding the petition
/supreme/docs/1906petition.pdf - 2019-03-14
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
appeal. We awarded Smith the costs and reasonable attorney fees associated with the frivolous appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16162 - 2005-03-31
appeal. We awarded Smith the costs and reasonable attorney fees associated with the frivolous appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary A. Miller
for the misconduct is a public reprimand. In addition, we conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20065 - 2017-09-21
for the misconduct is a public reprimand. In addition, we conclude that the costs of the proceeding, which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20065 - 2017-09-21
Dawn M. Malinowski v. Brian G. Malinowski
and insurance. The agreement provides: (f) The costs of routine repairs and maintenance for 2008 South Grand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11226 - 2005-03-31
and insurance. The agreement provides: (f) The costs of routine repairs and maintenance for 2008 South Grand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11226 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dawn M. Malinowski v. Brian G. Malinowski
the mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance. The agreement provides: (f) The costs of routine repairs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11226 - 2017-09-19
the mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance. The agreement provides: (f) The costs of routine repairs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11226 - 2017-09-19
Rosanne L. Johnson v. Michael E. Royalty, Jr.
custody of the parties’ two children to Johnson. He also ordered each party to contribute to the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13458 - 2005-03-31
custody of the parties’ two children to Johnson. He also ordered each party to contribute to the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13458 - 2005-03-31
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal[2] is frivolous because her arguments have no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal[2] is frivolous because her arguments have no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
the judgments. ¶2 Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal2 is frivolous because her arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25523 - 2017-09-21
the judgments. ¶2 Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal2 is frivolous because her arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25523 - 2017-09-21