Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 6341 for dr.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 6341 for dr.
[PDF]
State v. Domingo S. Hernandez
testified that he did not call Dr. Catherine Henry because Dr. Henry had formed the opinion that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9367 - 2017-09-19
testified that he did not call Dr. Catherine Henry because Dr. Henry had formed the opinion that one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9367 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to the jury trial, the County asked Dr. William Roberts to perform an independent psychological evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31137 - 2007-12-10
to the jury trial, the County asked Dr. William Roberts to perform an independent psychological evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31137 - 2007-12-10
ALH Company v. George Kriwkowitsch
, v. DR. GEORGE KRIWKOWITSCH, AND BETTY THOMPSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8355 - 2005-03-31
, v. DR. GEORGE KRIWKOWITSCH, AND BETTY THOMPSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8355 - 2005-03-31
State v. Domingo S. Hernandez
favorable to him. Trial counsel testified that he did not call Dr. Catherine Henry because Dr. Henry had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9367 - 2005-03-31
favorable to him. Trial counsel testified that he did not call Dr. Catherine Henry because Dr. Henry had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Meg C. O'Marro-Felli The Kingsbury Firm LLC W175N11117 Stonewood Dr., Suite 203A Germantown, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21
Meg C. O'Marro-Felli The Kingsbury Firm LLC W175N11117 Stonewood Dr., Suite 203A Germantown, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roger L. Kaufman
the law. The court stated that there was a very real likelihood of his reoffending, based both on Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11632 - 2005-03-31
the law. The court stated that there was a very real likelihood of his reoffending, based both on Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11632 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leon R. Steinle
conversations under those conditions.[5] At the hearing, Steinle presented the testimony of Dr. Douglas Wermuth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2279 - 2005-03-31
conversations under those conditions.[5] At the hearing, Steinle presented the testimony of Dr. Douglas Wermuth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the consequences of his acts. ¶5 A psychiatrist, Dr. Rhonda Davis, confirmed Brody’s vulnerability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52945 - 2014-09-15
the consequences of his acts. ¶5 A psychiatrist, Dr. Rhonda Davis, confirmed Brody’s vulnerability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52945 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶9 In a nutshell, this is Staves’s argument: Dr. Merrick [sic] testimony is simply not credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72457 - 2014-09-15
). ¶9 In a nutshell, this is Staves’s argument: Dr. Merrick [sic] testimony is simply not credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72457 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leon R. Steinle
the testimony of Dr. Douglas Wermuth. Dr. Wermuth confirmed Steinle’s hearing disability and that without his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2279 - 2017-09-19
the testimony of Dr. Douglas Wermuth. Dr. Wermuth confirmed Steinle’s hearing disability and that without his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2279 - 2017-09-19