Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 78671 for restraining order/1000.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 78671 for restraining order/1000.
State v. Marshall R. Reese
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: john Siefert, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: john Siefert, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Marshall R. Reese
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOHN SIEFERT, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOHN SIEFERT, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20870 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Solheim’s condition, but did not. ¶19 The court also considered Karen’s restraining order against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82187 - 2012-05-08
Solheim’s condition, but did not. ¶19 The court also considered Karen’s restraining order against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82187 - 2012-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Karen’s restraining order against Jeffery, but noted that it ended in 2007 and there had not since been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82187 - 2014-09-15
Karen’s restraining order against Jeffery, but noted that it ended in 2007 and there had not since been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82187 - 2014-09-15
Christopher H. Kartes v. Jane M. Kartes
a domestic abuse restraining order but dismissed her petition after obtaining and serving a temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18813 - 2005-07-05
a domestic abuse restraining order but dismissed her petition after obtaining and serving a temporary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18813 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Martin
ordered an en banc consideration. United States v. Kincade, 354 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir. 2004). We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7069 - 2017-09-20
ordered an en banc consideration. United States v. Kincade, 354 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir. 2004). We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7069 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
trailer was located right outside of the automotive center site. During installation, in order to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34222 - 2008-10-07
trailer was located right outside of the automotive center site. During installation, in order to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34222 - 2008-10-07
State v. Michael A. Martin
A. Martin, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7069 - 2005-03-31
A. Martin, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Fredric P. Spindler v. Bonita B. Spindler
discretion in ordering maintenance based on a 60/40 split of the joint income. In the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10451 - 2017-09-20
discretion in ordering maintenance based on a 60/40 split of the joint income. In the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10451 - 2017-09-20
Fredric P. Spindler v. Bonita B. Spindler
that the trial court misused its discretion in ordering maintenance based on a 60/40 split of the joint income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10451 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court misused its discretion in ordering maintenance based on a 60/40 split of the joint income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10451 - 2005-03-31