Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 2991 - 3000 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Margaret Smith v. Richard Golde
Smith appeals a judgment and an amended judgment for damages granted by the trial court on remand from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3384 - 2005-03-31
Smith appeals a judgment and an amended judgment for damages granted by the trial court on remand from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vernon L. Walker
numerous issues on appeal. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7786 - 2017-09-19
numerous issues on appeal. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to grant his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7786 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 1, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals...
a trial court decision denying his motion to suppress evidence based on an illegal search. Moseley also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81796 - 2012-04-30
a trial court decision denying his motion to suppress evidence based on an illegal search. Moseley also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81796 - 2012-04-30
[PDF]
Karen Lee Boldt v. James Edward Boldt, Jr.
the judgment of divorce. Karen claims the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24826 - 2017-09-21
the judgment of divorce. Karen claims the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24826 - 2017-09-21
Karen Lee Boldt v. James Edward Boldt, Jr.
under the judgment of divorce. Karen claims the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24826 - 2006-04-17
under the judgment of divorce. Karen claims the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24826 - 2006-04-17
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Harris
with a dangerous weapon. See §§ 940.01(1), 939.05, 939.63, & 939.32, STATS. He also appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13898 - 2014-09-15
with a dangerous weapon. See §§ 940.01(1), 939.05, 939.63, & 939.32, STATS. He also appeals from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13898 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry D. Harris
§§ 940.01(1), 939.05, 939.63, & 939.32, Stats. He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31
§§ 940.01(1), 939.05, 939.63, & 939.32, Stats. He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13898 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kerry Tucker
) and 947.01, STATS., respectively. The conviction followed a jury trial. Tucker No. 95-0963-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8875 - 2017-09-19
) and 947.01, STATS., respectively. The conviction followed a jury trial. Tucker No. 95-0963-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8875 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lawrence E. Green
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by failing to explain its reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21566 - 2006-02-27
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion by failing to explain its reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21566 - 2006-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
] The issues are whether Reed’s trial counsel was ineffective for allowing Reed to proceed to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42146 - 2009-10-13
] The issues are whether Reed’s trial counsel was ineffective for allowing Reed to proceed to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42146 - 2009-10-13