Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29901 - 29910 of 59723 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 29901 - 29910 of 59723 for quit claim deed/1000.
CA Blank Order
to support a meritorious claim that trial counsel was ineffective. Though we normally decline to address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98008 - 2013-06-11
to support a meritorious claim that trial counsel was ineffective. Though we normally decline to address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98008 - 2013-06-11
State v. Steven C.
greater than Steven’s claimed privacy interest. This appeal followed. Standard of Review ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5049 - 2005-03-31
greater than Steven’s claimed privacy interest. This appeal followed. Standard of Review ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5049 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
based on his claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Specifically, Shumate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630415 - 2023-03-08
based on his claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Specifically, Shumate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630415 - 2023-03-08
State v. Omar S. Polk
on the claim. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). In order to prove a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14766 - 2005-03-31
on the claim. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). In order to prove a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14766 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Johnson. Id., unpublished slip op. at 3. We rejected Johnson’s claim that Aviles’ identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35558 - 2014-09-15
Johnson. Id., unpublished slip op. at 3. We rejected Johnson’s claim that Aviles’ identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35558 - 2014-09-15
State v. Juan Mata
. Mata now claims that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it read the repeater portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12854 - 2005-03-31
. Mata now claims that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it read the repeater portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
As relevant here, WIS. STAT. § 968.20 provides: Return of property seized. (1) Any person claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64139 - 2014-09-15
As relevant here, WIS. STAT. § 968.20 provides: Return of property seized. (1) Any person claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64139 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the account change card, we are not persuaded. ¶7 With respect to form, the trust claims the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79601 - 2014-09-15
of the account change card, we are not persuaded. ¶7 With respect to form, the trust claims the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79601 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2021AP1182-CR 4 ¶7 We decide this claim based on Klyce’s failure to show that he was prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523196 - 2022-05-19
. No. 2021AP1182-CR 4 ¶7 We decide this claim based on Klyce’s failure to show that he was prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523196 - 2022-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“still had No. 2014AP2696 3 [their] TEAMS intact” at that time. Raquel claimed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160778 - 2017-09-21
“still had No. 2014AP2696 3 [their] TEAMS intact” at that time. Raquel claimed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160778 - 2017-09-21