Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29901 - 29910 of 83431 for simple case search.

[PDF] State v. Daniel D. Brown
a significant personal interest in the case, and under § 757.19(2)(g), because it prevented her from acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frank Rzepkowski v. Robert Schuenke
there is an exception to the exclusion that applies in this case. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14197 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). Nos. 2016AP1794-CR 2016AP1795-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. In these consolidated cases, Roland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197198 - 2017-10-04

State v. Jesse J. Madison
2004 WI App 46 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-3099 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5902 - 2005-03-31

State v. Norgie Vieras
in the record for the sentence. Id. This case requires that we review the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9528 - 2005-03-31

Margaret Hovey v. Allstate Insurance Company
, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had been called and dismissed. Her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15197 - 2005-03-31

State v. Peter J. Long
” in the intoxicated-driving case. Arguing in support of the motion, counsel for Long also contended that dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4622 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
concluded, “For reasons not related to the merits, this case is dismissed,” rather than repeating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21

City of Milwaukee v. Daniel E. Holman
appeared at a scheduling conference before the Honorable Jean DiMotto. The case was then scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14520 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Norgie Vieras
for the sentence. Id. This case requires that we review the trial court's inferences at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9528 - 2017-09-19