Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29911 - 29920 of 63537 for records.
Search results 29911 - 29920 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220831 - 2018-10-04
have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220831 - 2018-10-04
[PDF]
Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
. Douglas’s family suggests that the WDSS records document incidents in which Brandon engaged in sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
. Douglas’s family suggests that the WDSS records document incidents in which Brandon engaged in sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andres Godina
and the length of sentence were discussed. However, there is nothing in this record to persuade us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31
and the length of sentence were discussed. However, there is nothing in this record to persuade us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is supported by the record; (2) if the issue presents a legal question as to whether the undisputed facts here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05
is supported by the record; (2) if the issue presents a legal question as to whether the undisputed facts here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126124 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim, noting that the record established the total amount of restitution as $2,643.04. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
claim, noting that the record established the total amount of restitution as $2,643.04. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this latest motion. Jones offers no sufficient reason, and we can discern none from the record, why those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34069 - 2014-09-15
in this latest motion. Jones offers no sufficient reason, and we can discern none from the record, why those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34069 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and we can discern none from the record, why those issues were not raised previously, either in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34069 - 2008-09-22
, and we can discern none from the record, why those issues were not raised previously, either in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34069 - 2008-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS
further conclude that the record is insufficient to resolve whether there was an independent basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41629 - 2009-10-06
further conclude that the record is insufficient to resolve whether there was an independent basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41629 - 2009-10-06
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
out of the plea and the sentences,” and incredible. There is evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12447 - 2005-03-31
out of the plea and the sentences,” and incredible. There is evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12447 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did not order a [presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
for resentencing because the trial court failed to state on the record why it did not order a [presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03