Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29921 - 29930 of 44743 for part.
Search results 29921 - 29930 of 44743 for part.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1984). The defendant “must prevail on both parts of the test to be afforded relief.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504233 - 2022-04-05
(1984). The defendant “must prevail on both parts of the test to be afforded relief.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504233 - 2022-04-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the misinformation ‘formed part of the basis for the sentence.’” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶14 (citation omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925103 - 2025-03-11
that the misinformation ‘formed part of the basis for the sentence.’” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶14 (citation omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925103 - 2025-03-11
State v. Clarence Givens
requested a mistrial because part of his defense strategy was to argue that “[Givens] was not involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12420 - 2005-03-31
requested a mistrial because part of his defense strategy was to argue that “[Givens] was not involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12420 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155861 - 2017-09-21
or more acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155861 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
part, the court rebuffed Maresh’s testimony as a “bogus, incredible story.” The court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33066 - 2008-06-17
part, the court rebuffed Maresh’s testimony as a “bogus, incredible story.” The court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33066 - 2008-06-17
[PDF]
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
a prima facie case comprised of the following two parts. First, she must show the trial court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6348 - 2017-09-19
a prima facie case comprised of the following two parts. First, she must show the trial court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6348 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kelly Brown v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
the applicant had sold insurance on a part time basis before, it appears that he was making this a full time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5294 - 2017-09-19
the applicant had sold insurance on a part time basis before, it appears that he was making this a full time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5294 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appealed. We affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a Machner hearing on two issues. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293995 - 2020-10-06
appealed. We affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for a Machner hearing on two issues. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293995 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Charles Dante Higgs
[Section] 974.02. We therefore overrule the part of Cecchini which held that a reviewing court may look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15
[Section] 974.02. We therefore overrule the part of Cecchini which held that a reviewing court may look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14195 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alan D. Eisenberg
system were also revised in part. However, all references to supreme court rules will be to those
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16591 - 2017-09-21
system were also revised in part. However, all references to supreme court rules will be to those
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16591 - 2017-09-21