Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29921 - 29930 of 64076 for records/1000.
Search results 29921 - 29930 of 64076 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit reports and the responses, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105853 - 2013-12-16
considering the no-merit reports and the responses, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105853 - 2013-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Based upon our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257761 - 2020-04-21
a response. Based upon our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257761 - 2020-04-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Holmes
and sentencing hearings were two separate hearings. ¶8 On that record, the circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
and sentencing hearings were two separate hearings. ¶8 On that record, the circuit court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
-claims court record as a “court trial,” to determine what pecuniary loss, if any, the Reusches had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3409 - 2005-03-31
-claims court record as a “court trial,” to determine what pecuniary loss, if any, the Reusches had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3409 - 2005-03-31
State v. Phillip Wayne Harvey
eligibility” in imposing sentence. Id. ¶6 Upon our review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18774 - 2005-07-13
eligibility” in imposing sentence. Id. ¶6 Upon our review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18774 - 2005-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Larson
id. at 681-82. No. 01-0643-CR 5 ¶9 If the record contains evidence that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3695 - 2017-09-19
id. at 681-82. No. 01-0643-CR 5 ¶9 If the record contains evidence that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3695 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for affirming the revocation. The appeal decision stated in relevant part: The record supports the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60986 - 2011-03-14
for affirming the revocation. The appeal decision stated in relevant part: The record supports the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60986 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
are satisfied that the trial court’s factual findings were directly based upon testimony in the record and were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31177 - 2007-12-12
are satisfied that the trial court’s factual findings were directly based upon testimony in the record and were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31177 - 2007-12-12
State v. Creasie F.
by § 48.365(2m)(a), Stats. Because the record reveals that the juvenile court made the required findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11305 - 2005-03-31
by § 48.365(2m)(a), Stats. Because the record reveals that the juvenile court made the required findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11305 - 2005-03-31
Bersch & Company v. Dairyland Greyhound, Inc.
to evidentiary material in the record, that none of the alleged contracts, agreements, or prospective business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9513 - 2005-03-31
to evidentiary material in the record, that none of the alleged contracts, agreements, or prospective business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9513 - 2005-03-31