Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29921 - 29930 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to Pitt’s argument that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, Pitt faults trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717585 - 2023-10-25

[PDF] State v. Jason M. Mulroy
motion for postconviction relief. Mulroy argues the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6757 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
to WIS. STAT. § 343.305.2 He asserts that the trial court erred by revoking his operating privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence based on a challenge to probable cause, we uphold the trial court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36143 - 2009-04-13

CA Blank Order
could have drawn the appropriate inferences from the evidence adduced at trial to find the requisite
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106016 - 2013-12-19

Ron Strand v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
the policy. The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Auto-Owners. It ruled that under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4236 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 22, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
A. Patterson appeals a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of first-degree reckless homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117631 - 2014-07-21

[PDF] WI APP 39
of conviction for armed robbery and an order denying his postconviction motion. During the trial, Jaramillo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35570 - 2014-09-15

State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
. Stat. § 343.305.[2] He asserts that the trial court erred by revoking his operating privileges because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3291 - 2005-03-31

Scott F. Anderson v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
Anderson posits that the trial court had the inherent authority to fine him, but could only do so under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11699 - 2005-03-31