Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29941 - 29950 of 83387 for simple case search.
Search results 29941 - 29950 of 83387 for simple case search.
David M. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County PersonnelReview Board
, we grant Iushewitz's motion seeking appeal costs, fees, and attorney fees. We remand this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31
, we grant Iushewitz's motion seeking appeal costs, fees, and attorney fees. We remand this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8541 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306738 - 2020-11-24
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306738 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Because it was undisputed that Marnika’s parental rights had been terminated in those cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46156 - 2014-09-15
. Because it was undisputed that Marnika’s parental rights had been terminated in those cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46156 - 2014-09-15
Steven E. Mariades v. Marquette County
, and we held our decision in abeyance pending issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in a case raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13354 - 2005-03-31
, and we held our decision in abeyance pending issuance of the supreme court’s opinion in a case raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13354 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
required to prove prosecutorial overreaching are not present in this case. We agree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233481 - 2019-01-29
required to prove prosecutorial overreaching are not present in this case. We agree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233481 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Mineau’s arguments, and summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191642 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Mineau’s arguments, and summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191642 - 2017-09-21
Mark Olsen v. Edward Hoffmann
, and that the case should be reopened because Zehetner v. Chrysler Fin. Co., LLC, 2004 WI App 80, 272 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10
, and that the case should be reopened because Zehetner v. Chrysler Fin. Co., LLC, 2004 WI App 80, 272 Wis. 2d 628
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24751 - 2006-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to present its case in Michael’s absence. The case was then continued until February 19, 2007, the last day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32647 - 2008-05-07
to present its case in Michael’s absence. The case was then continued until February 19, 2007, the last day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32647 - 2008-05-07
[PDF]
Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Edward Hall
2005 WI App 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 04-0688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7374 - 2017-09-20
2005 WI App 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 04-0688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7374 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The cases were consolidated on Youra’s motion and tried to the court. Youra was found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94948 - 2014-09-15
. The cases were consolidated on Youra’s motion and tried to the court. Youra was found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94948 - 2014-09-15