Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29961 - 29970 of 83808 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 29961 - 29970 of 83808 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840528 - 2024-08-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840528 - 2024-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
The municipal court entered judgment against Brophy in all five cases, and Brophy did not appeal. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15
The municipal court entered judgment against Brophy in all five cases, and Brophy did not appeal. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61920 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Community Financial Services Center Corporation v. Carl Rucker
Center Corporation, the plaintiff in the small-claims case seeks frivolous-appeal costs and attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5865 - 2017-09-19
Center Corporation, the plaintiff in the small-claims case seeks frivolous-appeal costs and attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5865 - 2017-09-19
State v. Waylon A. Meyer
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The victim in this case claimed that in July and October 2001, Meyer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17629 - 2005-04-11
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The victim in this case claimed that in July and October 2001, Meyer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17629 - 2005-04-11
[PDF]
Diane Marie Conniff v. Richard Seth McCaleb
case, which we discuss below. Therefore, any error was harmless. ¶4 Conniff also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7030 - 2017-09-20
case, which we discuss below. Therefore, any error was harmless. ¶4 Conniff also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7030 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forth a prima facie case warranting an evidentiary hearing. In State v. Clark, 2022 WI 21, 401 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
forth a prima facie case warranting an evidentiary hearing. In State v. Clark, 2022 WI 21, 401 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171226 - 2017-09-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requested a “prompt disposition” of the case in a document received by the district attorney’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104801 - 2017-09-21
requested a “prompt disposition” of the case in a document received by the district attorney’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104801 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96230 - 2013-04-29
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96230 - 2013-04-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103978 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103978 - 2017-09-21