Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29961 - 29970 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 29961 - 29970 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
from the trial transcript in this case. Before trial, the court granted a motion to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
from the trial transcript in this case. Before trial, the court granted a motion to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2010AP2077-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96230 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2010AP2077-CR 2 record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96230 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2016AP2288 2016AP2289 2 at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205844 - 2017-12-15
. 2016AP2288 2016AP2289 2 at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205844 - 2017-12-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forth a prima facie case warranting an evidentiary hearing. In State v. Clark, 2022 WI 21, 401 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
forth a prima facie case warranting an evidentiary hearing. In State v. Clark, 2022 WI 21, 401 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
State v. Waylon A. Meyer
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The victim in this case claimed that in July and October 2001, Meyer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17629 - 2005-04-11
. BACKGROUND ¶2 The victim in this case claimed that in July and October 2001, Meyer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17629 - 2005-04-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171226 - 2017-09-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requested a “prompt disposition” of the case in a document received by the district attorney’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104801 - 2017-09-21
requested a “prompt disposition” of the case in a document received by the district attorney’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104801 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103978 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Diane Marie Conniff v. Richard Seth McCaleb
case, which we discuss below. Therefore, any error was harmless. ¶4 Conniff also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7030 - 2017-09-20
case, which we discuss below. Therefore, any error was harmless. ¶4 Conniff also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7030 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96230 - 2013-04-29
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1). We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96230 - 2013-04-29