Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29971 - 29980 of 32594 for r's.
Search results 29971 - 29980 of 32594 for r's.
Elgin v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert R. PekowskY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13374 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert R. PekowskY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13374 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: THOMAS R. WOLFGRAM, Reserve Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241247 - 2019-05-29
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: THOMAS R. WOLFGRAM, Reserve Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241247 - 2019-05-29
[PDF]
Joan La Rock v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Brown County: DONALD R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15362 - 2017-09-21
, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Brown County: DONALD R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wood County Department of Social Services v. James W. F.
; (2) Is Joshua R. in need of protection or services; and (3) Is Nathaniel M. in need of protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7617 - 2017-09-19
; (2) Is Joshua R. in need of protection or services; and (3) Is Nathaniel M. in need of protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7617 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Francis D. Warrichaiet
STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. ARNOLD R. WARRICHAIET
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7367 - 2017-09-20
STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. ARNOLD R. WARRICHAIET
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7367 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Certification
, was not a permissible purpose, stating: “[R]eally, [credibility is] only acceptable if there’s another acceptable
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618259 - 2023-02-08
, was not a permissible purpose, stating: “[R]eally, [credibility is] only acceptable if there’s another acceptable
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618259 - 2023-02-08
[PDF]
WI App 235
DECISION DATED AND FILED October 2, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30458 - 2014-09-15
DECISION DATED AND FILED October 2, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30458 - 2014-09-15
Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James R. Koby and John H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12761 - 2005-03-31
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James R. Koby and John H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 142
L. Ferguson and Todd R. McEldowney of O’Melia, Schiek & McEldowney, S.C., Rhinelander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103806 - 2017-09-21
L. Ferguson and Todd R. McEldowney of O’Melia, Schiek & McEldowney, S.C., Rhinelander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103806 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36136 - 2009-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36136 - 2009-04-13