Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29981 - 29990 of 59234 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 29981 - 29990 of 59234 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 9, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
claimed an easement over the Zeitelhack property. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27743 - 2007-01-08
claimed an easement over the Zeitelhack property. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27743 - 2007-01-08
State v. James Durrah
motion seeking a modification of his sentence. In the motion, Durrah claimed the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2236 - 2005-03-31
motion seeking a modification of his sentence. In the motion, Durrah claimed the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2236 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kerney Wright
five issues. He claims: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence out-of-court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10450 - 2005-03-31
five issues. He claims: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence out-of-court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10450 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven L. Harris
to impeach the arresting officer on whether he advised Harris that he was under arrest. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20351 - 2005-11-22
to impeach the arresting officer on whether he advised Harris that he was under arrest. We reject his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20351 - 2005-11-22
CA Blank Order
motion. We reject Barnes’s claim that the trial court erred by declining to send the physical evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116671 - 2014-07-15
motion. We reject Barnes’s claim that the trial court erred by declining to send the physical evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116671 - 2014-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
modification.[1] He also appeals the order denying reconsideration. He claims that his continued confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
modification.[1] He also appeals the order denying reconsideration. He claims that his continued confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, of the beneficial use of his [or her] property or of any part thereof’” in order to state a claim under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97222 - 2014-09-15
, of the beneficial use of his [or her] property or of any part thereof’” in order to state a claim under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Morris
. 443 (Oct. 21, 2002) (No. 02-356). We will address this claim in conjunction with our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4566 - 2017-09-19
. 443 (Oct. 21, 2002) (No. 02-356). We will address this claim in conjunction with our discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4566 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lorenzo H.
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31
to their daughters, Lynda D.H. and Keshaun G.H. Linda J. claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12748 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion. Hicks appeals. ¶5 Hicks’s ineffective assistance claim is that trial counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35052 - 2010-02-17
the motion. Hicks appeals. ¶5 Hicks’s ineffective assistance claim is that trial counsel failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35052 - 2010-02-17