Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29981 - 29990 of 68885 for had.
Search results 29981 - 29990 of 68885 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Yvette M. Thayer
she had a right to refuse a blood test. We disagree and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4396 - 2017-09-19
she had a right to refuse a blood test. We disagree and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4396 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, is merely evidence of negotiation. Lietz conceded there had been no breach of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92929 - 2014-09-15
, however, is merely evidence of negotiation. Lietz conceded there had been no breach of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92929 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andrew C. Polhamus
and saw that Peters had Travis by the shirt. Polhamus asked, “Hey, what’s going on?” Peters responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14196 - 2005-03-31
and saw that Peters had Travis by the shirt. Polhamus asked, “Hey, what’s going on?” Peters responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14196 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2007AP8 Cir. Ct. No. 2005TP29
had placed Junior outside the home for a cumulative period of at least six months. Andrea admitted
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28235 - 2014-09-15
had placed Junior outside the home for a cumulative period of at least six months. Andrea admitted
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28235 - 2014-09-15
State v. John R. Holsonback
that item.[2] His attorney also refers to the fact that the two items stolen only had a combined value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26005 - 2006-07-31
that item.[2] His attorney also refers to the fact that the two items stolen only had a combined value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26005 - 2006-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was marked exhibit 9. The report indicated that the victim had washed her vaginal area, rinsed her mouth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73904 - 2011-11-14
was marked exhibit 9. The report indicated that the victim had washed her vaginal area, rinsed her mouth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73904 - 2011-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
court, alleging that Stammen had violated the open records law, Wis. Stat. § 19.35. Both parties moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59343 - 2011-01-26
court, alleging that Stammen had violated the open records law, Wis. Stat. § 19.35. Both parties moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59343 - 2011-01-26
Michael J. Morgan v. Ford Motor Company
” in terms of “significantly” or “seriously” did not mislead the jury or suggest that Morgan had a higher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14390 - 2005-03-31
” in terms of “significantly” or “seriously” did not mislead the jury or suggest that Morgan had a higher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14390 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and a social worker had been at the house at the same time. Michelle testified that Mitchell had not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22
and a social worker had been at the house at the same time. Michelle testified that Mitchell had not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the previous ruling on reasonable suspicion.2 Judge Davis granted the motion, stating that while he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15
of the previous ruling on reasonable suspicion.2 Judge Davis granted the motion, stating that while he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88748 - 2014-09-15