Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29981 - 29990 of 63199 for records.
Search results 29981 - 29990 of 63199 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conducting an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586407 - 2022-11-08
conducting an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586407 - 2022-11-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
order. The record does not reflect that Nigl properly filed a motion as directed by the letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244248 - 2019-07-30
order. The record does not reflect that Nigl properly filed a motion as directed by the letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244248 - 2019-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response, supplement, and additional response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219529 - 2018-09-19
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response, supplement, and additional response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219529 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
To the extent necessary, we take judicial notice of those facts contained in CCAP records. See Kirk v. Credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006351 - 2025-09-09
To the extent necessary, we take judicial notice of those facts contained in CCAP records. See Kirk v. Credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006351 - 2025-09-09
State v. Stacy L. Blunt
of the record that [Blunt] knew of his right.” Id. Although our review of the record indicates that Blunt made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11680 - 2005-03-31
of the record that [Blunt] knew of his right.” Id. Although our review of the record indicates that Blunt made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11680 - 2005-03-31
Ann E. Bates v. John P. Dwyer
We will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16120 - 2005-03-31
We will not reverse a discretionary determination by the trial court if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16120 - 2005-03-31
Robert Mulligan v. Ronald A. Buss
this assertion. However, this appeal is properly decided on procedural grounds.[2] The record clearly indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14650 - 2005-03-31
this assertion. However, this appeal is properly decided on procedural grounds.[2] The record clearly indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14650 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alan D. Eisenberg
if it is “the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3474 - 2005-03-31
if it is “the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3474 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
solely from the record of the sentencing hearing. See State v. Grady, 2007 WI 125, ¶2, 305 Wis. 2d 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18
solely from the record of the sentencing hearing. See State v. Grady, 2007 WI 125, ¶2, 305 Wis. 2d 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36522 - 2009-05-18
County of Dane v. William S.
. Although the record does not contain an order appointing examiners, the parties agree that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11243 - 2005-03-31
. Although the record does not contain an order appointing examiners, the parties agree that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11243 - 2005-03-31