Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29981 - 29990 of 38464 for t's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-correction hearing and the September 13 order, “[t]here’s no defined amount [for the equalization payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133440 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Norman R.
worker testified that “[i]t took three foster parents before we found one who was willing to spend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5322 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kenosha Hospital & Medical Center v. Jesus E. Garcia
the judgment against the employer/garnishee was not a violation of the automatic stay because “[i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5420 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Steven J. Schuette v. Rebecca C. Gross-Schuette
assessment. Id. at 772-73. The supreme court reversed, saying, “[T]he trial court is not an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26309 - 2017-09-21

WI APP 89 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2363-CR 2010AP2364-CR ...
truth. Id., 567 U.S. at ___, 2012 WL 2202981, at *31–*34 (“[T]here was no plausible reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84628 - 2012-08-28

State v. Barbara A. DuVal
and Fittshur. In addition, DuVal stressed this fact in her closing argument: [T]hey were relying so much
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15260 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricky A. Myhre
’ extended supervision. In imposing the greater sentence, the court stated: [T]his court is well aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25935 - 2006-07-18

Erna Seidlitz v. Dieter Seidlitz
at the time of the hearing on Dieter’s motion for termination, the family court found that: [A]t the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12250 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
prior contact with law enforcement. The prosecutor stated to the court: “[I]t’s not [the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30

Ronald Beauchamp v. James A. Kemmeter
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: david t. flanagan, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2283 - 2005-03-31