Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 29991 - 30000 of 46683 for adult name change.

State v. Willy J. Love
Halama’s testimony and police report, its decision to deny the motion would not have changed. Love argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31

Heather C. Fischer v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.” In enlarged and bolded font, the phrase “UNINSURED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5616 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Derrick J.
visits that you’ve supervised has Dabr[e]sha’s demeanor with Mr. J[.] changed at all. A Slightly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7475 - 2017-09-20

2007 WI APP 213
step in the inquiry for photo arrays has changed and is now whether they are “unnecessarily suggestive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30123 - 2007-09-25

[PDF] State v. William H. Warren
. No. 95-3185-CR -11- A “new factor” that warrants a change in sentence is an event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9982 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
against him, but he later changed his pleas to not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760232 - 2024-02-06

Marquette University v. Debbie A. Lapertosa
final exams to be an excused absence. Moreover, her failing grade was changed to an “IX
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15513 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
Lawrence, but changed his mind and just wanted to scare him. ¶5 On July 16, 2004, Gray pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27410 - 2006-12-19

Ronald Collison v. City of Milwaukee Board of Review
contamination, the Board of Assessors changed the assessment from $110,000 to $79,000. On May 9, 2000, Collison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5441 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scott A. Morgan
and the trial court affirmed the change of the judgment order from “paid” to an amount owed of $21,774.57.6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7972 - 2017-09-19